So does anyone want to explain the California propositions in three sentences?
The Official Voter Information Guide is pretty decent, I think.
Much like the author, an ungainly vestigial limb to a twitter feed
-
-
tumbledore liked this
-
manymachines reblogged this from itsbedtime and added:
I agree with most of this, though I voted (last Thursday) Yes on 2. It probably will increase the cost of...
-
carrieabigstick reblogged this from spiegelman and added:
I’m not sure how I would vote if Prop 2 was on my ballot, but I think the back and forth on this argument is more often...
-
commedesfuckdwn reblogged this from spiegelman and added:
Hollar! (hardly an explanation, and a fairly libertarian standpoint, but I’m feeling it).
-
yumwatch reblogged this from spiegelman and added:
I agree with Spiegel. This Prop means that our eggs will come from Somewhere Else, Less Safe, More Expensive. The U.S....
-
spiegelman reblogged this from nickdouglas and added:
room for farm animals means...farmers can hold fewer...their...
-
alexlitel reblogged this from nickdouglas and added:
Slight correction at the end.
-
forthebooks reblogged this from blurredvision
-
predictablyawesome reblogged this from blurredvision and added:
Reblogged since this is how I’m voting. Except for Prop 1 (high speed rail link should lead
-
nickdouglas reblogged this from spiegelman and added:
Bull. 1A: We need that high-speed light rail to cut down on the massive carbon emissions (and expense) of SF-to-LA...
-
itsbedtime reblogged this from spiegelman
-
blurredvision reblogged this from liana and added:
NO on 1A - High-Speed Train Bond Act A train linking LA...San Francisco? No thanks....
-
gregbrown reblogged this from liana and added:
The Official Voter Information Guide is pretty decent, I think.
-
liana posted this
-
Theme: Linear by Peter Vidani
